<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ComicList - Latest Comments in ComicList - TFAW Reviews The New Star Trek Movie</title><link>http://comiclist.disqus.com/</link><description>ComicList was founded Jan. 12, 1995 with the mission of empowering comic book consumers by providing accurate and timely information. </description><atom:link href="https://comiclist.disqus.com/comiclist_tfaw_reviews_the_new_star_trek_movie/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 20:18:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ComicList - TFAW Reviews The New Star Trek Movie</title><link>http://www.comiclist.com/index.php/news/title#comment-9192391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think many, if not most, of the Star Trek movies spent too much time&lt;br&gt;trying to please someone- the fan base, the actors, continuity- and&lt;br&gt;not enough time trying to be great movies.  To me, ST II was the best&lt;br&gt;story and contained the best acting, and was the most authentic when&lt;br&gt;it came to the characters.   I look forward to viewing the new movie&lt;br&gt;to see how it ranks to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ComicList</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 20:18:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ComicList - TFAW Reviews The New Star Trek Movie</title><link>http://www.comiclist.com/index.php/news/title#comment-9188057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The new Star Trek keeps the audience's attention so much better than the other Star Treks... there is something fundamentally wrong with a movie that feels like a chore to watch (as are so many of the original Star Treks)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nomad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:53:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>